Pre-engineering automation for utility-scale solar

From site to system.

From site boundary to preliminary engineering package — in one pass.

Everything before detail design, in one project context — so AutoCAD and PVsyst start from real numbers. Built in Germany for EPC and developer teams worldwide.

See how LayoutIQ works →
Project Setup
SiteIQ
TerrainIQ
LayoutIQ
YieldIQ
RevenueIQ
PVMath Report / ZIP
7
Workflow steps
≤ 10 min
Site Screening Time
Global
Solar Data Coverage
Free
To Get Started

A week of fragmented pre-engineering. One connected workflow.

Manual GIS & setbacks

Days of parcel work before layout — often in a tool that never talks to yield or economics.

Layout iterations in CAD

Row packing rebuilt by hand when the boundary changes — disconnected from terrain and BOM.

Edge strings found late

Wind-exposed strings spotted in review — after structural and electrical work has begun.

PVMath does not replace engineers. It delivers the preliminary engineering package in one pass, so your AutoCAD and PVsyst hours start from real numbers instead of assumptions.

Workflow

One project context. Five modules. One package.

Then export the unified PDF + project ZIP — DXF, LandXML, BOM, and PVsyst input file where applicable.

Sample Project

168.6 ha · SAT 2P · ~118 MWp DC preliminary layout.

Outputs from a real screening run — Osten, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Input

  • Site boundary · 168.6 ha · Cuxhaven, Germany

PVMath

  • Terrain + layout · Yield + economics

Output

  • Unified PDF + LandXML · PVsyst input file
AutoCAD-style DXF preview of Sample Project SAT 2P layout
DXF exportCAD-ready layout geometry for handoff.
Bill of materials excerpt with string counts and I/E split
BOM excerptModules, strings, I/E split, inverters — same project package.

Screening-grade only. Not bankable yield, not LiDAR, not stamped civil or structural design.

See PVMath run a real project.

From site boundary to engineering outputs — Sample Project, Lower Saxony.

Real outputs. One guided workflow.

Outputs from a real screening run — Osten, Lower Saxony, Germany.

Download sample PVMath PDF →

Panels below summarise the verified Sample Project run: Single-Axis Tracker 2P on a 168.6 ha coastal site in Lower Saxony. Download the unified PVMath PDF for the full package.

SITEIQ — SITE ASSESSMENT

53.73°N, 9.19°E · Osten, Cuxhaven, Germany · 168.6 ha

  • Fixed-tilt POA1,227 kWh/m²/yr Good
  • GHI Annual1,042 kWh/m²/yr
  • Mean slope0.4° Excellent
  • Flood RiskHigh

Monthly GHI (kWh/m²)

J
F
M
A
M
J
J
A
S
O
N
D
Site boundary168.6 ha
Mount selectedSAT 2P
Terrain score99/100

PVGIS JRC · OpenStreetMap · EEG 2023 Freifläche

TERRAINIQ — SLOPE ANALYSIS

168.6 ha · Copernicus EEA-10 DEM (Europe route)

-2m -6m 4m range
−6 m
−2 m Elev.
  • Elevation range4 m
  • Mean slope0.4° Excellent
  • Area < 2.5°99.9%
  • Analysis grid5 m (default layout grid · EEA-10 ~10 m native)
PDF Report
DXF + LandXML

EU: EEA-10 · US: 3DEP · Global: FABDEM

LAYOUTIQ — AUTO LAYOUT

Single-Axis Tracker · 2P · GCR 0.41 · pitch 12.05 m

  • Mount typeSAT 2P selected
  • DC capacity118.4 MWp
  • Modules182,112
  • Pitch / GCR12.05 m / 0.41
  • Tracker units555
  • Strings (I/E)2,499 / 753
  • External share23.2%
  • Inverters481 × 196 kW
Project ZIP
Layout DXF
Electrical Layout
PVsyst Input File

GIS setbacks · I/E wind flags · IEC string & cable sizing

Internal / External classification — validated on a 580 MWp tracker project Read the I/E method →

YIELDIQ — YIELD ESTIMATION

118.4 MWp DC · SAT 2P selected · PVGIS-SARAH2

Specific Yield (kWh/kWp/yr)

SAT — double portrait (2P)1,224
Fixed @ same GCR 0.411,010
  • Tracker gain (2P vs FT)+21.2%
  • PR (2P Tracker)86.8%
  • Annual energy~144.9 GWh/yr
Intended for early-stage screening; validate with a detailed PVsyst or bankable energy assessment before investment decisions.

Source: PVGIS JRC ERA5

REVENUEIQ — ECONOMIC SCREENING

118.4 MWp DC · Germany · Gov auction band

  • CAPEX (DC)€64–103 M
  • LCOE25–42 €/MWh
  • Project IRR−2.6–4.8% Screening
  • Simple payback8–19 yr

Viability band

MARGINAL — proceed with detailed tender & offtake diligence
Indicative screening only. Not bankable financial modelling or investment advice.

Benchmark CAPEX & tariff bands · 2025–2026

Representative only. Outputs vary by location and configuration.

Why PVMath

Engineering-grade screening estimates.
Not a bankable study.

Industry-standard datasets. Screening-grade speed. Honest limits built in — and handoff into the tools you already run.

Industry-Standard Solar Data

PVGIS (EC JRC) GHI and irradiation — used in bankable pre-feasibility worldwide.

Region-Routed Terrain Data

Best available public DEM per region — Copernicus EEA-10 (Europe), USGS 3DEP (USA), FABDEM (global), GLO-30 fallback — resampled to a 5 m layout grid.

CAD Software Ready

Layout DXF and LandXML terrain with parcel linework — UTM-georeferenced or local-origin. No manual redraw from KMZ.

Unified engineering package

PDF, BOM, PVsyst input file, and project ZIP on paid plans — screening, terrain, yield, and economics for go/no-go calls.

IEC string & cable sizing

Electrical screening with rated sizing — not a rough sketch.

I/E wind-exposure flags

Tracker screening validated against an independent CAD classification of a 580 MWp project — flags structural risk before it reaches your structural engineer.

Screening-grade only. Not bankable yield, not LiDAR, not stamped civil or structural design. Confirm with survey and detail engineering before FEED.

About PVMath

From the field.
Not a desk.

Founded and built by a utility-scale solar engineer — hands-on experience across Fixed Tilt and Single-Axis Tracker ground-mount design, terrain engineering, and EPC project delivery in Germany and across Europe.

Built for problems that cost project hours — not boardroom features.

Purpose-Built for Solar

Solar site assessment and engineering — not a generic GIS tool.

Global Coverage, European Roots

Built in Germany. Global PVGIS + Copernicus data. Regulatory flags for DE, AT, ES, US, IN, AU, and more.

Shipped, Not Promised

All seven workflow steps are live today. Roadmap driven by working engineers, not feature checklists.

Who uses PVMath.

EPCs

Protect engineering hours — screen before you commit CAD time.

Developers

Compare sites with layout, yield and economics in one context.

Engineering teams

Start AutoCAD and PVsyst from shared, package-ready numbers.

Protect engineering hours. Screen before you commit.

Try the connected utility-scale workflow — or book a short technical walkthrough.

Common questions from engineers.

SiteIQ through RevenueIQ — screening, layout, yield, economics, and one unified report.

What does the seven-step workflow cover?

Project setup → SiteIQ → TerrainIQ → LayoutIQ → YieldIQ → RevenueIQ → unified PDF + project ZIP (paid plans). One boundary, one credit at the LayoutIQ sweep — TerrainIQ, YieldIQ, and RevenueIQ on the same project do not use extra credits.

Is this a bankable study or a substitute for PVsyst / DNV / Aurora?

No. Pre-feasibility go/no-go only. YieldIQ is intended for early-stage screening; validate with a detailed PVsyst or bankable energy assessment before investment decisions. RevenueIQ uses indicative CAPEX and tariff bands — not investment advice. TerrainIQ uses public DEM, not LiDAR. LayoutIQ is a screening layout, not construction-ready detail design.

What does LayoutIQ produce?

Pitch/GCR sweep, DC capacity, and BOM for fixed tilt (1P–4P) or single-axis tracker (1P/2P). GIS setbacks, layout DXF, optional A1 electrical drawing, and a PVsyst input file for import into PVsyst.

What does RevenueIQ show?

Ten-line CAPEX breakdown, tariff revenue bands, OPEX, LCOE, IRR, NPV, payback, and sensitivity — country-aware auction/PPA modes. Feeds the PVMath site score. Screening only; engage a financial advisor before financial close.

Can I use TerrainIQ exports in CAD?

Yes — for early layout. UTM LandXML surface and georeferenced DXF contours from your boundary. Public DEM screening grade — commission LiDAR before FEED and pile design.

What is in the Step 7 report?

Subscribed plans only: one PDF with all modules, PVMath site rating, and grouped next steps. Project ZIP includes layout DXF, terrain LandXML, BOM CSV, A1 layout sheet, and unified screening PDF.

How is the PVMath score calculated?

A weighted composite (0–100) from module factor scores: grid/regulatory, terrain, energy yield, land use, flood risk, and solar resource. With RevenueIQ, economic viability adds a seventh factor (~20%). Challenging terrain can cap the overall score. Verdict bands run Excellent ≥90 through Critical <45 — see the score breakdown table in your report.

Who is PVMath built for?

Solar EPCs, developers, and engineering firms screening utility-scale ground mount worldwide. Fixed tilt and tracker, standard and Agri-PV.

Still deciding if PVMath fits your pipeline? Request a short demo on a real site.

Book a 20-min walkthrough →

Get in touch.

Pricing, subscribe, or enterprise? We reply within one business day.

PVMath

Pre-engineering automation for EPCs, project developers, and engineering firms worldwide.

Response time: Within 1 business day
Languages: English, Deutsch

Try PVMath Free →